Gabriel Knight... there are destinies we cannot avoid

NEWS

NEW Norwegian translation of this site!
NEW “Cat hair moustache” puzzle – full exposé!
NEW Interview with Scott Bilas (technical lead, GK3) by Philip Jong.
NEW Full transcript of Ingrid Heyn’s interview with Robert Holmes.
NEW The Bavaria article is now up.
NEW Yates poem: GK inspiration article is now up.
POSTCARD PETITION GK forum postcard petition to VUG; example text is here on the campaign site.
SIGN Our guestbook is waiting for your signature;
IMPORTANT! How you can help with the GK4 Campaign;
FORTHCOMING Rennes-le-Château; St George; The Templars.

English  ·  Deutsch  ·  Português  ·  Français  ·  Italiano  ·  Русский  ·  Español  ·  Norsk  ·  Česky  ·  ελληνικά  ·  עברית

Film reviews

The Lost Boys (1)  |  The Lost Boys (2)  |  Nosferatu  |  Angel Heart  |  Sin City  |  The Skeleton Key  |  Van Helsing  |  Van Helsing (2)  |  Wild Flowers  |  Cube  |  The Serpent and the Rainbow  |  Vidocq  |  The Raven  |  Night Watch  |  Interview with the Vampire  |  Dog Soldiers  |  Constantine  |  Underworld  |  Murder On The Orient Express  |  Batman Begins  |  Romasanta  |  Blowup  |  The Da Vinci Code  |  Citizen X  |  Dark City  |  The Howling  |  Pan's Labyrinth  |  The Illusionist  | 

Interview with the Vampire

Interview with the Vampire

Released: 1994
Director: Neil Jordan
Based on: Novel by Anne Rice
Cast: Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Kirsten Dunst, Stephen Rea, Antonio Banderas, Christian Slater, Domiziana Giordano
Rating: ♦♦◊◊◊

TaglineDrink From Me And Live Forever

There were three questions that I asked myself upon beginning this review: How does one begin to review a movie so appallingly bad as Interview with the Vampire? Why did it have to be this way when the book itself isn’t half-bad? And why did I waste two hours on watching this tripe?

The visuals in this film are extremely sumptuous and the costumes obviously keep to the various periods under discussion (e.g. luxuriant silks and satins for Louis XVI’s court, suit and tie for present-day Los Angeles, etc.). Kirsten Dunst as Claudia is charmingly evil; Stephen Rea as Santiago is competently cruel. Unfortunately, the two main protagonists bring this picture to a crashing halt. I can no more imagine Brad Pitt as Louis de Pointe du Lac than I can imagine him as Achilles, no more can I imagine Tom Cruise as Lestat de Lioncourt than I can imagine him as the Top Gun or as the hero of Mission: Impossible.

Spoiler Just one scene in this movie stands out for me, and if you haven’t seen the movie, you’re not missing much, so please read on. The first scene I have in mind occurs in the days of Louis XVI, when the crowd finds out that Louis (no relation to Louis XVI) and his family are vampires. At this point they drag Brad Pitt into a coffin and hammer it shut, while putting his wife and daughter in a jail cell to wait for sunlight. Brad Pitt escapes from his coffin and rushes to free his family – only to find out he’s too late and they’ve turned to ashes. There are two very glaring problems here: vampires are supposedly extremely good at mind control. It’s, after all, what they do best. Why on earth would they reveal to a crowd of extras that they’re vampires? Failing that, vampires are alleged to be extremely strong. They’d have to be in order to overwhelm their victims. Since this is so, surely Brad Pitt could simply burst out of his coffin much sooner – or his wife and child could burst out of their cell before they’re turned to dust. But I suppose dramatic causality must take precedence over logic. Oh well.

While Brad Pitt gives a slightly believable performance as the pouting and moping Louis – I kept expecting him to go Goth at any moment and paint his fingernails black – Tom Cruise is a comically over-the-top villain as Lestat. As such, both of them simply ruined the movie for me.

 

 

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!    Valid CSS!

 
|  Home  |   Who IS Gabe Knight?   |   The story so far  |   Continue with GK4?  |   How YOU can help  |